<p>Actually, both of them could lose her reputations for a kiss. Even now, it's a thing. You didn't see in high school any slut shaming? Or in the media? Women get slut shaming for things men don't.
</p><p>Kemal Pamuk was raised as a British gentleman to deal with British gentlemen/ladies, so "another culture" is not an excuse here. If he knows what to do in a hunt or how to behave in a dinner, it's obvious he was raised on that matter too.
</p><p>Coming back to the subject of the post, it is assault if one of the involved, even if they have a loving relationship already going on, is uncouncious, drunk, drugged or sleep. Thomas is my fave, but I won't excuse his actions here ever. Was that so difficult just to wake up Jimmy before? I mean, even without the kiss, noone wants anyone in his room, watching you without being noticed, no matter what Twilight says it was "romantic"...
</p><p>Also, there's too the power dinamics overlooked here: Thomas is Jimmy's superior. Thomas doesn't really have much power in truth, but if he were the butler, for example, he just could fire Jimmy instantly if he refuses, which is something usually happens when you're harassed at work. Did Anna a chance (a woman, a maid) against Green (a man, a valet) or Thomas himself (a man, a footman) against the Duke (a man, a Duke)? They were really in a position to refuse? Jimmy has a good reason to want this silenced, even Carson said that (it was more for the family's reputation, though).
</p>