Category talk:Candidates for deletion

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.

Mr Bromidge's mother

All the same information is contained in the article about Mr. Bromidge himself. CestWhat (talk) 18:13, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with this, the page is never going to be more than a stub and no one is going to come to this wikia looking for a page on Mr Bromidge's mother, it'd be best to simply keep the information in the page on Mr Bromidge himself as CestWhat says. It's repetition and unnecessary. Bluebellanon (talk) 20:16, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Ditto not a character deserving a page.Abbess (talk) 22:28, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Lady Rose's siblings

Unless anymore infomration beyond their names and one being married is ever given, they could all be just mentioned on the article for Lady Rose and her parents rather then their own one-sentence articles only showing the character's relatives. Maybe in an upcoming series, more will information about them given, they might be added again. CestWhat (talk) 18:15, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with this for the same reasons as CestWhat gives above. Bluebellanon (talk) 20:20, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Reginald Crawley's house

Where to begin. "Nothing to suggest" and every sentence starting with "may or may not" is a valid source. There is no evidence whatsoever that Reginald Crawley ever set in that house since no clue when Matthew and Isobel moved into (assuming isn't the same thing). We don't know the nature of their ownership (did they rent). It's just silly for one contributor to guess at it.

Also the article is totally redundant from the article Manchester. CestWhat (talk) 18:14, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Mr Cox

All the information on this page is contained in the page for Joss Tufton. This page is simply repeating that, no one is going to come to the wikia searching for an article on Mr Cox, and this article is never going to be more than a one line stub. If he ever appears in the show we can give him a page, until then I say delete. Bluebellanon (talk) 20:12, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, all the Mr. Cox information is on the Jos Tufton page, and anyone looking for Mr. Cox will find Charlie Cox who plays the Duke of Crowborough. So delete. Abbess (talk) 23:44, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Patrick Crawley

I'd actually support keeping Patrick Crawley as his own page. As the off-screen characters go, he's pretty major and mentioned in multiple episodes. Plus he'd be a character would be curious about so easy to imagine that page still getting traffic and interest. CestWhat (talk) 03:59, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

I to support keeping Patrick on his own page. The main events of the first season are a direct effect of his death. Although he is an off-screen character, he is very important. 

Pardon, this is my one and only edit (thus far) on this wikia, but I absolutely recommend keeping Patrick Crawley's page. So  much of the plot of the first season is driven by his dath, and as CestWhat mentioned, he is very frequently mentioned that I could imagine a viewer who is trying to catch up with the plot might search for him specifically.--24.49.40.223 04:53, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

I agree this page should be kept.Abbess (talk) 22:27, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Crawley's Dentist

Definitely delete. However, I think that there might be a page about the Crawley's and their patronage of the local economy. This information could go there.Abbess (talk) 23:14, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Harold Levinson

Definitely keep Harold, I think that he will show up as a character someday.Abbess (talk) 19:55, March 9, 2013 (UTC)

Isidore Levinson

I do not think this page should be deleted, because I think that there is going to be more information about him and Harold, as Shirley MacLaine is coming back. And if it is true that he was Jewish, that should come into the storyline as anti-Jewish sentiments grow in Europe. Abbess (talk) 23:53, March 10, 2013 (UTC)