Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.
- I agree with this, the page is never going to be more than a stub and no one is going to come to this wikia looking for a page on Mr Bromidge's mother, it'd be best to simply keep the information in the page on Mr Bromidge himself as CestWhat says. It's repetition and unnecessary. Bluebellanon (talk) 20:16, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
Lady Rose's siblings
Unless anymore infomration beyond their names and one being married is ever given, they could all be just mentioned on the article for Lady Rose and her parents rather then their own one-sentence articles only showing the character's relatives. Maybe in an upcoming series, more will information about them given, they might be added again. CestWhat (talk) 18:15, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with this for the same reasons as CestWhat gives above. Bluebellanon (talk) 20:20, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
Reginald Crawley's house
Where to begin. "Nothing to suggest" and every sentence starting with "may or may not" is a valid source. There is no evidence whatsoever that Reginald Crawley ever set in that house since no clue when Matthew and Isobel moved into (assuming isn't the same thing). We don't know the nature of their ownership (did they rent). It's just silly for one contributor to guess at it.
All the information on this page is contained in the page for Joss Tufton. This page is simply repeating that, no one is going to come to the wikia searching for an article on Mr Cox, and this article is never going to be more than a one line stub. If he ever appears in the show we can give him a page, until then I say delete. Bluebellanon (talk) 20:12, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
Agreed, all the Mr. Cox information is on the Jos Tufton page, and anyone looking for Mr. Cox will find Charlie Cox who plays the Duke of Crowborough. So delete. Abbess (talk) 23:44, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
I'd actually support keeping Patrick Crawley as his own page. As the off-screen characters go, he's pretty major and mentioned in multiple episodes. Plus he'd be a character would be curious about so easy to imagine that page still getting traffic and interest. CestWhat (talk) 03:59, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
I to support keeping Patrick on his own page. The main events of the first season are a direct effect of his death. Although he is an off-screen character, he is very important.
Pardon, this is my one and only edit (thus far) on this wikia, but I absolutely recommend keeping Patrick Crawley's page. So much of the plot of the first season is driven by his dath, and as CestWhat mentioned, he is very frequently mentioned that I could imagine a viewer who is trying to catch up with the plot might search for him specifically.--220.127.116.11 04:53, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
Definitely delete. However, I think that there might be a page about the Crawley's and their patronage of the local economy. This information could go there.Abbess (talk) 23:14, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
I do not think this page should be deleted, because I think that there is going to be more information about him and Harold, as Shirley MacLaine is coming back. And if it is true that he was Jewish, that should come into the storyline as anti-Jewish sentiments grow in Europe. Abbess (talk) 23:53, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
Lady Anabelle's Husband
- Not just delete, but also removed from the list of minor off-screen characters. CestWhat (talk) 03:39, March 18, 2013 (UTC)
One is that this article is just a laundry list of relatives. We know nothing about Violet's father. Series One press kit mentions that he is a baronet, but that can easily be mentioned on Violet's own article. CestWhat (talk) 23:15, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
Things mentioned on the Cheerful Charlies' poster
There are several other groups mentioned on this poster as well as the Victoria Theatre where the show was taking place. I think that the Cheerful Charlies page should be saved and all the other information should be put on that. I'm not sure if the Victoria Theatre is a location page or not. Perhaps it is because the Titanic is a valid location page and it was only mentioned and never seen.Abbess (talk) 00:58, March 29, 2013 (UTC)